Forbidden Archeology and millions of other books are available for instant access. .. Michael A Cremo is a research associate of the Bhaktivedanta Institute. Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson quickly became a best selling underground. Forbidden Archeology has ratings and 48 reviews. James said: Well, I guess controversy sells. This is a horrible book. Michael Cremo has set archaeol.
|Published (Last):||14 February 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This book contains numerous examples of disregarded evidence just because it did not fit into the preconcieved notions of how things progressed, illustrating how anthropology and archaeology are not ‘sciences’ if one repeatedly disregards This book made me want to major in archaeology – unfortunately, many of the college professors out there are adament against anything outside of the flrbidden that they believe is set in stone, even now, almost a dozen years after this book was first published.
Book ratings by Goodreads. Founded in by His Divine Grace A.
Forbidden Archeology : The Hidden History of the Human Race
My problem, and it is a personal one, is that I do not have the academic background to argue with them. Cremo is also a “associate member of the Bhaktivedanta Institute specializing in history and philosophy of science.
Jul 17, John rated it liked it. Goodreads helps you keep archeollgy of books you want to read. Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on? Retrieved 23 June That’s the same tabloid you see in the supermarket aisle with headlines about aliens and Bat Boy.
One day he made a comment about the “mongoloid” heritage of the Finnish people and explained that it was likely due to arcyeology fact that the Finns were an isolated direct ancestor of “homo erectus” and not quite “homo sapiens sapiens”. It is fascinating stuff and gives a forbideen deal of food for thought. No stars because I didn’t finish it. Lists with This Book. Moreover, they say, although granting the book’s theory that anatomically modern humans co-existed with more primitive forms would certainly alter our acrheology thinking about human history, it would not invalidate orthodox evolutionary theory.
Michael Cremo – RationalWiki
It is essentially a textbook. And I haven’t even gotten to the weird parts yet. Support the film here! Mar 12, AniKore rated it it was amazing. But, Feder says, “When you attempt to deconstruct a well-accepted arhceology, it is reasonable to expect that a new paradigm be suggested in its place.
This is not an easy book to read. External links Twitter Facebook Discord. The book is well written with adequate definitions to many field specific terms throughout the book, but it is still a big bite to chew. Non sequitur su non sequitur.
And he brings forward various objections to their analysis of eolithsstone artifacts sometimes regarded as tools. We conclude that the total evidence From Archaeology to Archaeologies: But this book changes the fields of anthropology and archeology to their very cores.
Institute for Creation Research: This is a mighty tome, and not for those wanting a bit flrbidden light reading. Jul 30, Alicedewonder rated it it was amazing. There is a depth of information that needs time to be read and processed for those of us who are not professionals in the field. As he crosses disciplinary and cultural boundaries, he presents to his various audiences a compelling case for negotiating a new consensus on the nature of reality. This would be necessary because so many scientists and academics would be hostile to their thesis.
Still, their readings of the paleoarcheological and paleoanthropological records and how scientists whom arcbeology tow the ‘party’ line are treated is, for the most part, valid if not convincing. No trivia or quizzes yet. I disagree because this book is basically about the history of the science of archaeology.
Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo
Jan 17, Kelli George rated it it was amazing. Jun 05, Nathan rated it liked it. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. They spent several summers traveling throughout Europe. Academic Papers Works in Progress: Dec 07, Devero rated it did not like it. But starting from about the s, paleoanthropologists turned to the view that human beings first evolved in the next era, archeollgy Pleistocene 2.
Worth the effort to get thr I actually read this book a while back and it is brilliant. My archaeology professor told me that this book was written by a wacko with fringe theories even though he had not read it.